Gyenis, Zalán and Wronski, Leszek (2020) Admissibility and Bayesian direct inference: no HOPe against ubiquitous defeaters. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
Defeaters_review_final-unblind.pdf Download (394kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the ``admissibility troubles'' for Bayesian accounts of direct inference proposed in (Wallmann, 2018), which concern the existence of surprising, unintuitive defeaters even for mundane cases of direct inference. We first show that one could reasonably suspect that the source of these troubles was informal talk about higher-order probabilities: for cardinality-related reasons, classical probability spaces abound in defeaters for direct inference. We proceed to discuss the issues in the context of the rigorous framework of Higher Probability Spaces (Gaifman, 1988). However, we show that the issues persist; we prove a few facts which pertain both to classical probability spaces and to HOPs, in our opinion capturing the essence of the problem. In effect we strengthen the message from the admissibility troubles: they arise not only for approaches using classical probability spaces---which are thus necessarily informal about metaprobabilistic phenomena like agents having credences in propositions about chances---but also for at least one respectable framework specifically tailored for rigorous discussion of higher-order probabilities.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
|||||||||
Keywords: | Bayesianism, probabilistic defeaters, Higher order probability | |||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
|||||||||
Depositing User: | Zalán Gyenis | |||||||||
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2020 00:09 | |||||||||
Last Modified: | 30 Jan 2020 00:09 | |||||||||
Item ID: | 16860 | |||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
|||||||||
Date: | 23 January 2020 | |||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16860 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The ubiquitous defeaters: no admissibility troubles for Bayesian accounts of direct inference. (deposited 02 Aug 2019 04:11)
-
Admissibility and Bayesian direct inference: no HOPe against ubiquitous defeaters. (deposited 23 Jan 2020 16:31)
- Admissibility and Bayesian direct inference: no HOPe against ubiquitous defeaters. (deposited 30 Jan 2020 00:09) [Currently Displayed]
-
Admissibility and Bayesian direct inference: no HOPe against ubiquitous defeaters. (deposited 23 Jan 2020 16:31)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |