Flannery, Maura C. (2012) Flatter than a Pancake: Why Scanning Herbarium Sheets Shouldn't Make Them Disappear. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 6 (1). pp. 225-232. ISSN 1913-0465
|
Text
16134-Article Text-43463-2-10-20121003.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (303kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Herbaria are collections of preserved plant specimens, primarily composed of paper sheets with pressed plants or plant parts attached to them. The most valuable kind of sheet is the holotype specimen. This is the specific plant that was used in describing the species by the person who first identified it. Botanists must reference the holotype when reclassifying or renaming a species. In the past, this meant either borrowing the sheet or visiting the herbarium in which it was housed. With digitization of these sheets, there is much greater and easier access to this information. However, digital images are not substitutes for the sheets themselves. This article will discuss why this is the case, why scanning herbarium sheets is still worthwhile effort, and why the sheets themselves are still necessary to plant research.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}