Green, Christopher D. (1992) Of Immortal Mythological Beasts: Operationism in Psychology. [Preprint]

HTML operat.htm Download (89kB)

Abstract

It is practically an article of faith in psychology that in order to do empirical research one must first operationally define one's variables. However, the 'operational attitude', first advocated by the physicist Percy Bridgman in the 1920s, has since been rejected by virtually every serious philosopher of science as unworkable. Furthermore. 'operationism' -- as developed by psychologists in the 1930s and 1940s -- was based on a misunderstanding of Bridgman's intent from the outset. Nevertheless, contemporary textbooks continue to extol the virtues of operational definitions and today's psychology students are still required to learn the strategy. This paper discusses the historical background of operationism, its transmission from physics to psychology and the reasons for its continued tenacity in the face of repeated refutations and Bridgman's own repudiation in the 1950s.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Green, Christopher D.
Keywords:	operationism, operationalism, methodology, scientific method, psychology, physics, meaning, concepts
Subjects:	General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Operationalism/Instrumentalism Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User:	Christopher D. Green
Date Deposited:	14 Mar 2001
Last Modified:	07 Oct 2010 15:10
Item ID:	199
Subjects:	General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Operationalism/Instrumentalism Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date:	1992
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/199

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item