Miller, Ryan (2023) Chemical Reduction and Quantum Interpretation: A Case for Thomistic Emergence. Foundations of Chemistry. ISSN 1386-4238
This is the latest version of this item.
Text
reductioninterpretation-preprint.pdf Download (294kB) |
Abstract
The debate between ontological reductionists and emergentists in chemistry has revolved around quantum mechanics. What Franklin and Seifert (BJPS 2020) add to the long-running dispute is an attention to the measurement problem. They contend that all three realist interpretations of the quantum formalism capable of resolving the measurement problem also obviate any need for chemical emergence. I push their argument further, arguing that the realist interpretations of quantum mechanics actually subvert the basis for reduction as well, by undercutting the idea that fundamental physical particles are actual parts of molecules. With both reduction and traditional synchronic emergence pictures ruled out, the only option for realists about quantum chemistry is strong Thomistic emergence.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Chemical Reduction and Quantum Interpretation: A Case for Thomistic Emergence. (deposited 16 Aug 2023 14:08)
- Chemical Reduction and Quantum Interpretation: A Case for Thomistic Emergence. (deposited 31 Aug 2023 15:56) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
View Item |