Jeler, Ciprian (2024) Trait-centered vs. fitness-centered definitions of natural selection. [Preprint]
Text
Article - Trait-centered vs fitness-centered definitions.pdf Download (335kB) |
Abstract
During the past few decades, fitness-centered and trait-centered definitions of natural selection have coexisted in the philosophical literature. The former render natural selection definitionally dependent on the presence of fitness differences, where “fitness” is understood as a distinct property from actual reproductive success. On the other hand, trait-centered definitions see selection as definitionally dependent on the presence of a causal relation between a trait (not necessarily fitness) and reproductive success. Interestingly, endorsers of these definitions have rarely – and usually only cursorily – critically engaged the views of the other camp. Therefore, a critical comparison of the two kinds of definitions is lacking in the literature. This paper starts filling this void by opening a discussion about which of the two kinds of definition is more appropriate. I first argue that fitness-centered definitions have difficulties in accommodating cases of opposing selection on correlated traits, whereas trait-centered views have no such problems. To do so, I revisit an old argument put forth by Elliott Sober and I show that recent attempts from the fitness-centered camp to reply to Sober’s charge are unsuccessful. I then show that fitness-centered views also have problems with a different type of case, namely opposing selection on a single trait; trait-centered views, on the other hand, may accommodate such cases if, as I propose here, we specify that the causal relation that figures prominently in them is understood as a relation of contributing causation. These arguments suggest that trait-centered definitions of selection are preferable to fitness-centered ones.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | philosophy of biology; natural selection; fitness; opposing selection; correlated traits; sexually antagonistic selection | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Causation |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Ciprian Jeler | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2024 12:49 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 05 Sep 2024 12:49 | ||||||
Item ID: | 23874 | ||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory General Issues > Causation |
||||||
Date: | 2024 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/23874 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |