Mizrahi, Moti (2025) Kuhnian History of Science and the “Great Man” of Science Model. [Preprint]
![]() |
Text
Kuhn_Great_Man_Science_Model.pdf Download (309kB) |
Abstract
I argue that forays into history of science in Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962/1996) are by and large instances of “Great Man” history of science. “Great Man” history is the idea that history is the biography of great men. The “Great Man” of science model not only excludes women and people of color from science but also suggests that only special, exceptional people can succeed in science. If this is correct, then Kuhn (1962/1996) fails to usher in a “historiographic revolution in the study of science” or a “new historiography” (Kuhn 1962/1996, 3), as the book purports to do. Instead, it merely perpetuates the defunct historiography of the “Great Man” of science.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Digital Philosophy of Science, Great Man history, Great Man of science model, Historiography, Thomas Kuhn | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Theory Change |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr. Moti Mizrahi | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2025 15:13 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 21 Feb 2025 15:13 | ||||||
Item ID: | 24786 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Theory Change |
||||||
Date: | 21 February 2025 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/24786 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |