Barnum, Howard
(1990)
Dieks' Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Comment.
UNSPECIFIED.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
D. Dieks has proposed a semantical rule which he claims yields a realistic interpretation of the formalism of quantum mechanics without the projection postulate. I argue that his proposal is unacceptable because it violates a natural requirement of psychophysical parallelism. His "semantical rule" is not an acceptable interpretive rule because it does not identify structures in the theory with structures in our experience, but postulates a merely probabilistic relationship between the two. Dieks' interpretation is contrasted with Everett's relative state interpretation, which attempts the same task but respects psychophysical parallelism.
| Item Type: |
Other
|
| Creators: |
| Creators | Email | ORCID  |
|---|
| Barnum, Howard | | |
|
| Additional Information: |
Unpublished 1990 preprint, has seen some limited circulation since then. |
| Keywords: |
quantum mechanics modal interpretation Dieks probabilities psychophysical parallelism |
| Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
| Depositing User: |
Howard Barnum
|
| Date Deposited: |
09 Mar 2006 |
| Last Modified: |
07 Oct 2010 15:13 |
| Item ID: |
2649 |
| Public Domain: |
No |
| Commentary on: |
D. Dieks, "Quantum Mechanics Without the Projection Postulate and its Realistic Interpretation", Foundations of Physics vol. 19, pp. 1397-1423 (1989) |
| Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
| Date: |
1990 |
| URI: |
https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2649 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |