Barnum, Howard
(1990)
Dieks' Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Comment.
UNSPECIFIED.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
D. Dieks has proposed a semantical rule which he claims yields a realistic interpretation of the formalism of quantum mechanics without the projection postulate. I argue that his proposal is unacceptable because it violates a natural requirement of psychophysical parallelism. His "semantical rule" is not an acceptable interpretive rule because it does not identify structures in the theory with structures in our experience, but postulates a merely probabilistic relationship between the two. Dieks' interpretation is contrasted with Everett's relative state interpretation, which attempts the same task but respects psychophysical parallelism.
Item Type: |
Other
|
Creators: |
Creators | Email | ORCID |
---|
Barnum, Howard | | |
|
Additional Information: |
Unpublished 1990 preprint, has seen some limited circulation since then. |
Keywords: |
quantum mechanics modal interpretation Dieks probabilities psychophysical parallelism |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
Depositing User: |
Howard Barnum
|
Date Deposited: |
09 Mar 2006 |
Last Modified: |
07 Oct 2010 15:13 |
Item ID: |
2649 |
Public Domain: |
No |
Commentary on: |
D. Dieks, "Quantum Mechanics Without the Projection Postulate and its Realistic Interpretation", Foundations of Physics vol. 19, pp. 1397-1423 (1989) |
Subjects: |
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
Date: |
1990 |
URI: |
https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2649 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |