Amico-Korby, Dallas (2025) The Epistemic Organism: A Defense of Other-Regarding Epistemic Obligations. [Preprint]
|
Text
The Epistemic Organism final submission unblinded.pdf - Accepted Version Download (448kB) |
Abstract
It’s a well-recognized truth that what’s morally or politically required can come apart from what’s best for you individually. But this thought—the thought that what’s epistemically required may be divorced from what’s epistemically best for you—is mostly absent in epistemology. On the traditional picture, epistemic obligations are assumed to be self-regarding. In this paper, I argue against this dogma. I argue that we have other-regarding epistemic obligations and epistemic obligations to the groups we are members of. Further, I show how these obligations can play a role in justifying the levying of epistemic taxes.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Social Epistemology; Political Epistemology; Epistemic norms; Epistemic Obligations; taxes; Role-based obligations | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Values General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Dallas Amico-Korby | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2025 11:46 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2025 11:46 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 27100 | ||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Epistemology Specific Sciences > Mathematics > Values General Issues > Social Epistemology of Science |
||||||
| Date: | 2 November 2025 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/27100 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



