PhilSci Archive

Are the AI models used in science really models?

Moev, Tzvetan (2026) Are the AI models used in science really models? In: UNSPECIFIED.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
Are_the_AI_models_used_in_science_really_models__v2 (2).pdf

Download (355kB)

Abstract

We often refer to Deep Neural Nets (DNNs) as models. This paper utilizes the use of DNNs in economics as a case study to examine whether they really function as models in science. I argue for two main claims. First, DNNs function differently from the main types of models used in science. Second, DNNs should be understood as measuring instruments that are not models. Thus, we should not refer to the DNNs used in science as models. This argument has important implications for the philosophical questions that we can legitimately ask about the DNNs used in science.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Moev, Tzvetantzvetan.moev@gmail.com
Keywords: AI models, philosophy of economics, scientific instruments
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence
Specific Sciences > Economics
General Issues > Models and Idealization
Depositing User: Mr Tzvetan Moev
Date Deposited: 01 Jun 2026 12:32
Last Modified: 01 Jun 2026 12:32
Item ID: 29846
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Artificial Intelligence
Specific Sciences > Economics
General Issues > Models and Idealization
Date: March 2026
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29846

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item