Barberousse, Anouk (2007) A Case of Irrationality? In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
case_of_irrationality.pdf Download (115kB) |
Abstract
Were Maxwell and Boltzmann irrational to develop statistical mechanics whereas it was empirically refuted by the specific heats problem? My analysis of this historical episode departs from the current proposals about belief change. I first give a detailed description of Maxwell's and Boltzmann's epistemic states in the years they were working on statistical mechanics and then make some methodological proposals in epistemology that would account for the complexity of this case.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | formal epistemology applied to history of science, belief change, theory change, description of epistemic states | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies | ||||||
Depositing User: | Anouk Barberousse | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2007 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:15 | ||||||
Item ID: | 3587 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Science Case Studies | ||||||
Date: | 2007 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3587 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |