Van Dyck, Maarten (2008) Dynamics of Reason and the Kantian Project. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
FriedmanPSA.pdf Download (97kB) |
Abstract
I show why Michael Friedman’s idea that we should view new constitutive frameworks introduced in paradigm-change as members of a convergent series, introduces an uncomfortable tension in his views. It cannot be justified on realist grounds, as this would compromise his Kantian perspective, but his own appeal to a Kantian regulative ideal of reason cannot do the job either. I then explain how to make better sense of the rationality of paradigm-change on what I take to Friedman’s own terms.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Friedman Kant convergence | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Theory Change General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
||||||
Depositing User: | Maarten Van Dyck | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2008 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:17 | ||||||
Item ID: | 4332 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Theory Change General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism |
||||||
Date: | 2008 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4332 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |