Dorato, Mauro (2009) Peirce’s “method of tenacity” and the “method of science”: the consistency of pragmatism and naturalism. UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
Peircef[1].pdf Download (123kB) |
Abstract
In 1877 Peirce distinguished four different methods of “fixating our beliefs”, among which I here concentrate on what could be called the “method of tenacity” and the “method of science”. I then use these distinctions to argue that despite their apparent conflict, pragmatism, relying on the method of tenacity, and naturalism, relying on the method of science, can and should coexist, both in science and in metaphysics.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Other | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Pragmatism, Peirce, Naturalism, Determinism, Free Will | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Depositing User: | Dr Mauro Dorato | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 30 Aug 2009 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:18 | ||||||
Item ID: | 4856 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Philosophers of Science General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||
Date: | 2009 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4856 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |