Saatsi, Juha (2010) Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In: UNSPECIFIED.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF
EPSA09_Saatsi.pdf Download (406kB) |
Abstract
This paper discusses three shortcomings of the current state of the debate regarding historical evidence against scientific realism. Attending to these issues will direct the debate away from over-generalising wholesale arguments.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Miracles argument; Kirchhoff; Pessimistic induction | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Juha Saatsi | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2010 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:19 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 5230 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
| Date: | 2010 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5230 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}