Griffiths, Paul E. (2001) What is Innateness? [Preprint]
| PDF Download (46Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
In behavioral ecology some authors regard the innateness concept as irretrievably confused whilst others take it to refer to adaptations. In cognitive psychology, however, whether traits are 'innate' is regarded as a significant question and is often the subject of heated debate. Several philosophers have tried to define innateness with the intention of making sense of its use in cognitive psychology. In contrast, I argue that the concept is irretrievably confused. The vernacular innateness concept represents a key aspect of 'folkbiology', namely, the explanatory strategy that psychologists and cognitive anthropologists have labeled 'folk essentialism'. Folk essentialism is inimical to Darwinism, and both Darwin and the founders of the modern synthesis struggled to overcome this way of thinking about living systems. Because the vernacular concept of innateness is part of folkbiology, attempts to define it more adequately are unlikely to succeed, making it preferable to introduce new, neutral terms for the various, related notions that are needed to understand cognitive development.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | innateness folkbiology nativism instinct human nature essentialism typological thinking population thinking canalisation |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Anthropology Specific Sciences > Biology > Developmental Biology Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Psychology Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science Specific Sciences > Psychology/Psychiatry |
| Depositing User: | Paul Edmund Griffiths |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2001 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:10 |
| Item ID: | 108 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/108 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


