Bod, Rens (2004) Explaining New Phenomena in Terms of Previous Phenomena. [Preprint]
| PDF Download (65Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
It has become increasingly clear that natural phenomena cannot be formally deduced from laws but that almost every phenomenon has its own particular way of being linked to higher-level generalizations, usually via approximations, normalizations and corrections. This article deals with the following problem: if there are no general principles to link laws to phenomena, and if each phenomenon has its own way of being explained, how can we -- or how can a theory -- explain any new phenomenon? I will argue that while particular explanations only apply to the specific phenomena they describe, parts of such explanations can be productively reused in explaining new phenomena. This leads to a view on theory, which I call maximalism, according to which new phenomena are understood in terms of previous phenomena. On the maximalist view, a theory is not a system of axioms or a class of models, but a dynamically updated corpus of explanations. New phenomena are explained by combining fragments of explanations of previous phenomena. I will give an instantiation of this view, based on a corpus of phenomena from classical and fluid mechanics, and show that the maximalist approach is not only used but also needed in scientific practice.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | particularism, exemplar-based explanation, model-based reasoning, analogy-based explanation, maximalism |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Models and Idealization General Issues > Laws of Nature General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Physics |
| Depositing User: | Rens Bod |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Feb 2004 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:12 |
| Item ID: | 1602 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1602 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


