PhilSci Archive

Does the Rational Theory of Addiction Suffer Explanatory Impotence?

Reagan, Andy (2009) Does the Rational Theory of Addiction Suffer Explanatory Impotence? In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Reagan_RTA.doc

Download (60kB)

Abstract

In this essay I examine the Rational Theory of Addiction proposed by Becker and Murphy in 1988. Their theory is an extension of rational choice theory to explain and predict aspects of addiction. Becker and Murphy conceive of addiction as a process of deciding to use (or abstaining from use) based on a rationally well-informed decision that consumption (or non-consumption of) the drug will maximize benefit over costs. I propose formal diagnostic conditions for the term 'addict' according to RTA. I then show how the theory has explanatory deficits in differentiating between two kinds of addicts (willing and unwilling addicts).


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Reagan, Andy
Keywords: addiction, rational choice
Subjects: General Issues > Thought Experiments
General Issues > Decision Theory
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science
Depositing User: Andy Reagan
Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2009
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4526
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4526

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item