Reagan, Andy (2009) Does the Rational Theory of Addiction Suffer Explanatory Impotence? In:  Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, 101st Annual Meeting (Savannah, GA April 9-11).
|Microsoft Word (.doc) |
In this essay I examine the Rational Theory of Addiction proposed by Becker and Murphy in 1988. Their theory is an extension of rational choice theory to explain and predict aspects of addiction. Becker and Murphy conceive of addiction as a process of deciding to use (or abstaining from use) based on a rationally well-informed decision that consumption (or non-consumption of) the drug will maximize benefit over costs. I propose formal diagnostic conditions for the term 'addict' according to RTA. I then show how the theory has explanatory deficits in differentiating between two kinds of addicts (willing and unwilling addicts).
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Social Networking:|| |
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Keywords:||addiction, rational choice|
|Subjects:||General Issues > Thought Experiments|
General Issues > Decision Theory
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science
|Conferences and Volumes:|| Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, 101st Annual Meeting (Savannah, GA April 9-11)|
|Depositing User:||Andy Reagan|
|Date Deposited:||18 Mar 2009|
|Last Modified:||07 Oct 2010 11:17|
Actions (login required)