Wagner, Carl (2011) Is conditioning really incompatible with holism? [Preprint]
|
Microsoft Word
Is_conditioning_really_incompatible_with_holism.doc Download (66kB) |
Abstract
Jonathan Weisberg (British J. for the Phil. of Science 60(2009), 793-812) claims, that in an interesting class of cases, probability assessments constructed by strict or Jeffrey conditioning preclude subsequent revision by after-the-fact defeaters of the reasons supporting those assessments, and that conditioning is thus "inherently anti-holistic." His analysis founders, however, in applying Jeffrey conditioning to a partition for which an essential rigidity condition clearly fails. Applied to an appropriate partition, Jeffrey conditioning is amenable to revision by after-the-fact defeaters in precisely the way that Weisberg demands.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Jeffrey conditioning, holism, defeater, rigidity | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Carl Wagner | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2011 11:39 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2011 11:39 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 8690 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
| Date: | 28 March 2011 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8690 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



