Wagner, Carl (2011) Is conditioning really incompatible with holism? [Preprint]
Microsoft Word
Is_conditioning_really_incompatible_with_holism.doc Download (66kB) |
Abstract
Jonathan Weisberg (British J. for the Phil. of Science 60(2009), 793-812) claims, that in an interesting class of cases, probability assessments constructed by strict or Jeffrey conditioning preclude subsequent revision by after-the-fact defeaters of the reasons supporting those assessments, and that conditioning is thus "inherently anti-holistic." His analysis founders, however, in applying Jeffrey conditioning to a partition for which an essential rigidity condition clearly fails. Applied to an appropriate partition, Jeffrey conditioning is amenable to revision by after-the-fact defeaters in precisely the way that Weisberg demands.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Jeffrey conditioning, holism, defeater, rigidity | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
Depositing User: | Carl Wagner | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2011 11:39 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2011 11:39 | ||||||
Item ID: | 8690 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Decision Theory |
||||||
Date: | 28 March 2011 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8690 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |