Pitts, J. Brian (2013) Time and Fermions: General Covariance vs. Ockham's Razor for Spinors. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Time and Matter  TAM 2013. pp. 185198. ISSN 9789616311793

PDF (Contribution to conference proceedings)
TAM2013TimeandFermionsConfProc.pdf  Published Version Download (148kB) 
Abstract
It is a commonplace in the foundations of physics, attributed to Kretschmann, that any local physical theory can be represented using arbitrary coordinates, simply by using tensor calculus. On the other hand, the physics and mathematics literature often claims that spinors \emph{as such} cannot be represented in coordinates in a curved spacetime. These commonplaces are inconsistent. What general covariance means for theories with fermions is thus unclear.
In fact both commonplaces are wrong. Though it is not widely known, Ogievetsky and Polubarinov (OP) constructed spinors in coordinates in 1965, enhancing the unity of physics and helping to spawn particle physicists' concept of nonlinear group representations. Roughly and locally, OP spinors resemble the orthonormal basis or tetrad formalism in the symmetric gauge, but they are conceptually selfsufficient and more economical. The typical tetrad formalism is thus deOckhamized, with six extra field components and six compensating gauge symmetries to cancel them out. As developed nonperturbatively by Bilyalov, OP spinors admit any coordinates at a point, but `time' must be listed first; `time' is defined in terms of an eigenvalue problem involving the metric components and the matrix $diag(1,1,1,1)$, the product of which must have no negative eigenvalues. Thus even formal general covariance requires reconsideration; the atlas of admissible coordinate charts should be sensitive to the types and \emph{values} of the fields involved.
Apart from coordinate order and the usual spinorial twovaluedness, (densitized) OgievetskyPolubarinov spinors form, with the (conformal part of the) metric, a nonlinear geometric object. Important results on Lie and covariant differentiation are recalled and applied. The rather mild consequences of the coordinate order restriction are explored in two examples: the question of the conventionality of simultaneity in Special Relativity, and the Schwarzschild solution in General Relativity.
Export/Citation:  EndNote  BibTeX  Dublin Core  ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago)  HTML Citation  OpenURL 
Social Networking: 
Item Type:  Published Article or Volume  

Creators: 


Additional Information:  The proceedings editor put his paper at the physics arxiv here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4407 I take that to indicate permission for me to act similarly.  
Keywords:  spinor, fermion, general covariance, geometric object, nonlinear group realization, conventionality of simultaneity, Schwarzschild solution  
Subjects:  Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles Specific Sciences > Mathematics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Gravity Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances 

Depositing User:  Dr. Dr. J. Brian Pitts  
Date Deposited:  25 Jul 2014 12:50  
Last Modified:  25 Jul 2014 12:50  
Item ID:  10900  
Journal or Publication Title:  Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Time and Matter  TAM 2013  
Publisher:  University of Nova Gorica Press  
Subjects:  Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles Specific Sciences > Mathematics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Gravity Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances 

Date:  2013  
Page Range:  pp. 185198  
ISSN:  9789616311793  
URI:  https://philsciarchive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10900 
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item 