PhilSci Archive

The Forgotten Tradition. How the Logical Empiricists missed the Philosophical Significance of the work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci

Giovanelli, Marco (2012) The Forgotten Tradition. How the Logical Empiricists missed the Philosophical Significance of the work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci. Erkenntnis, 78 (6). pp. 1219-1257. ISSN 0165-0106

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Forgotten_Tradition_(korrigiert).pdf - Submitted Version

Download (703kB)

Abstract

Abstract. The paper attempts to show how the Logical Empiricists’ interpretation of the relation between geometry and reality emerges from a “collision” of mathematical traditions. Considering Riemann’s work as the initiator of a 19th century geometrical tradition, whose main protagonists were Helmholtz and Poincaré, the Logical Empiricists neglected the fact that Riemann’s revolutionary insight flourished rather in a non-geometrical tradition dominated by the works of Christoffel and Ricci-Curbastro roughly in the same years. I will argue that in the attempt to draw the line Riemann-Helmholtz-Poincaré-Einstein Logical Empiricists were led to argue that General Relativity raised mainly a problem of mathematical under-determination, i.e. the discovery that there are physical differences that cannot be expressed in the relevant mathematical structure of the theory. However, a historical reconstruction of the alternative line of development Riemann-Chritoffel-Ricci-Einstein shows on the contrary that the main philosophical issue raised by Einstein’s theory was rather that of mathematical over-determination, i.e. the recognition of the presence of redundant mathematical differences that do not have any correspondence in physical reality.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Giovanelli, Marcomarco.giovanelli@gmail.com
Keywords: Logical Empiricism, Absolute Differential Calculus, General Relativity, Hans Reichenbach
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Specific Sciences > Mathematics
Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Depositing User: Dr. Marco Giovanelli
Date Deposited: 29 Dec 2013 17:33
Last Modified: 29 Dec 2013 17:33
Item ID: 10160
Journal or Publication Title: Erkenntnis
Publisher: Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-...
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1007/s10670-012-9407-2
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Specific Sciences > Mathematics
Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Date: 2012
Page Range: pp. 1219-1257
Volume: 78
Number: 6
ISSN: 0165-0106
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10160

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item