Andersen, Holly (2016) What Would Hume Say? Regularities, Laws, and Mechanisms. [Preprint]

Preview

Text What Would Hume Say preprint.pdf Download (147kB) | Preview

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationship between laws and mechanisms as approaches to characterising generalizations and explanations in science. I give an overview of recent historical discussions where laws failed to satisfy stringent logical criteria, opening the way for mechanisms to be investigated as a way to explain regularities in nature. This followed by a critical discussion of contemporary debates about the role of laws versus mechanisms in describing versus explaining regularities. I conclude by offering new arguments for two roles for laws that mechanisms cannot subsume, one epistemically optimistic and one pessimistic, both broadly Humean. Do note that this piece is not primarily Hume exegesis; it is more of a riff in the key of Hume.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Andersen, Holly holly_andersen@sfu.ca
Additional Information:	forthcoming in Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanistic Philosophy, Phyllis Ilari & Stuart Glennan (eds.)
Keywords:	regularity, laws, mechanisms, explanation, causation, Hume
Subjects:	General Issues > Causation General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Laws of Nature
Depositing User:	Dr. Holly Andersen
Date Deposited:	26 Aug 2016 16:37
Last Modified:	26 Aug 2016 16:37
Item ID:	12387
Subjects:	General Issues > Causation General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Laws of Nature
Date:	2016
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12387

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item