De Haro, Sebastian (2020) Spacetime and Physical Equivalence. In: UNSPECIFIED.
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
Spacetime and Physical Equivalence.pdf - Published Version Download (344kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this essay I begin to lay out a conceptual scheme for: (i) analysing dualities as cases of theoretical equivalence; (ii) assessing when cases of theoretical equivalence are also cases of physical equivalence. The scheme is applied to gauge/gravity dualities. I expound what I argue to be their contribution to questions about: (iii) the nature of spacetime in quantum gravity; (iv) broader philosophical and physical discussions of spacetime.
(i)-(ii) proceed by analysing duality through four contrasts. A duality will be a suitable isomorphism between models: and the four relevant contrasts are as follows:
(a) Bare theory: a triple of states, quantities, and dynamics endowed with appropriate structures and symmetries; vs. interpreted theory: which is endowed with, in addition, a suitable pair of interpretative maps.
(b) Extendable vs. unextendable theories: which can, respectively cannot, be extended as regards their domains of application.
(c) External vs. internal intepretations: which are constructed, respectively, by coupling the theory to another interpreted theory vs. from within the theory itself.
(d) Theoretical vs. physical equivalence: which contrasts formal equivalence with the equivalence of fully interpreted theories.
I will apply this scheme to answering questions (iii)-(iv) for gauge/gravity dualities. I will argue that the things that are physically relevant are those that stand in a bijective correspondence under duality: the common core of the two models. I therefore conclude that most of the mathematical and physical structures that we are familiar with, in these models (the dimension of spacetime, tensor fields, Lie groups), are largely, though crucially never entirely, not part of that common core. Thus, the interpretation of dualities for theories of quantum gravity compels us to rethink the roles that spacetime, and many other tools in theoretical physics, play in theories of spacetime.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Additional Information: | Winner of the 2016-2017 essay contest "Space and Time After Quantum Gravity" of the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Geneva. | ||||||
| Keywords: | duality, spacetime, theoretical equivalence, physical equivalence, quantum gravity | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Gravity Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory General Issues > Structure of Theories Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Dr Sebastian De Haro | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 11 Jun 2020 03:23 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 11 Jun 2020 03:23 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 17305 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Gravity Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory General Issues > Structure of Theories Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances |
||||||
| Date: | 10 June 2020 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/17305 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Spacetime and Physical Equivalence. (deposited 21 Jul 2017 14:00)
- Spacetime and Physical Equivalence. (deposited 11 Jun 2020 03:23) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}