Coelho Mollo, Dimitri (2021) Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
WHYGOF~2.PDF - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (233kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The traditional view in (philosophy of) cognitive science is that computation in cognitive systems conceptually depends on representation: to compute is to manipulate representations. I argue that accepting the non-semantic teleomechanistic view of computation lays the ground for a promising alternative strategy, in which computation helps to explain and naturalise representation, rather than the other way around. I show that this computation-based approach to representation presents six decisive advantages over the traditional view. I claim that it can improve the two most influential current theories of representation, teleosemantics and structural representation, by providing them with precious tools to tackle some of their main shortcomings. In addition, the computation-based approach opens up interesting new theoretical paths for the project of naturalising representation, in which teleology plays a role in individuating computations, but not representations.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation. (deposited 19 Feb 2021 16:21)
-
Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation. (deposited 13 Mar 2021 00:06)
- Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation. (deposited 13 Mar 2021 00:07) [Currently Displayed]
-
Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation. (deposited 13 Mar 2021 00:06)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
View Item |