PhilSci Archive

Three Concepts of Actual Causation

Fischer, Enno (2021) Three Concepts of Actual Causation.

[img] Text
Fischer - Three Concepts of Actual Causation - JA.pdf

Download (395kB)

Abstract

I argue that we need to distinguish between three concepts of actual causation: total, path-changing, and contributing actual causation. I provide two lines of argument in support of this account. First, I address three thought experiments that have been troublesome for unified accounts of actual causation, and I show that my account provides a better explanation of corresponding causal intuitions. Second, I provide a functional argument: if we assume that a key purpose of causal concepts is to guide agency, we are better off making a distinction between three concepts of actual causation.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Fischer, Ennoefischer@uni-wuppertal.de0000-0003-3758-4655
Keywords: Causal Models, Redundancy, Functional Account, Trumping
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
General Issues > Decision Theory
General Issues > Explanation
Depositing User: Enno Fischer
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2025 14:48
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2025 14:48
Item ID: 18892
Official URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/...
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
General Issues > Decision Theory
General Issues > Explanation
Date: 26 March 2021
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/18892

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item