Ford, Sharon R
(2009)
The Viability of a Pure-Power Ontology.
In: UNSPECIFIED.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89fdf/89fdf60d339e9f9eed4b46106e4e7cef64818a4b" alt="" Preview |
|
PDF
2009_Sharon_R_Ford_-_Viability_of_a_Pure_Power_Theory.pdf
Download (241kB)
|
Abstract
In accounting for the objects and properties of the manifest world, issues include the fundamentality, causal efficacy and ontological robustness of the dispositional (powers, potentials, capacities) versus the non-dispositional (categorical, qualitative). Concerning fundamentality, the available options seem to be that: (i) dispositional and categorical properties are different kinds, both fundamental; (ii) dispositional and categorical properties are one and the same, and fundamental; (iii) only categorical properties are fundamental while dispositional properties, if they exist, are higher-order; and (iv) only dispositional properties are fundamental while categorical properties, if they exist, are higher-order. The viability of option (iv), a pure-power ontology, has met detracting arguments from several quarters. This paper outlines why the fourth option appears nonetheless attractive and provides a defence for its credibility by suggesting how the manifestly qualitative world can be explained without recourse to fundamental categorical properties.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Loading...
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Loading...
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b957c/b957c32ba904d071ac409de91a699d082ce03394" alt="View Item View Item" |
View Item |