Werndl, Charlotte (2012) Evidence for the Deterministic or the Indeterministic Description? -- A Critique of the Literature about Classical Dynamical Systems. [Preprint]
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF
PaperCharlotteWerndl_GeneralPhilofSci.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
It can be shown that certain kinds of classical deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions are observationally equivalent. In these cases there is a choice between deterministic and indeterministic descriptions. Therefore, the question arises of which description, if any, is preferable relative to evidence. This paper looks at the main argument in the literature (by Winnie, 1998) that the deterministic description is preferable. It will be shown that this argument yields the desired conclusion relative to in principle possible observations where there are no limits, in principle, on observational accuracy. Yet relative to the currently possible observations (the kind of choice of relevance in practice), relative to the actual observations, or relative to in principle observations where there are limits, in principle, on observational accuracy the argument fails because it also applies to situations where the indeterministic description is preferable. Then the paper comments on Winnie's (1998) analogy between his argument for the deterministic description and his argument against the prevalence of Bernoulli randomness in deterministic descriptions. It is argued that while there is indeed an analogy, it is also important to see that the arguments are disanalogous in another sense.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Additional Information: | Forthcoming in Journal for General Philosophy of Science | ||||||
| Keywords: | determinism, indeterminism, randomness, underdetermination, ergodic theory, stochatic processes, dynamical systems | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Mathematics Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Charlotte Werndl | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 25 Aug 2012 15:25 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 25 Aug 2012 15:25 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 9291 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Mathematics Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
| Date: | 2012 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9291 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}