Isaac, Alistair (2013) Model Uncertainty and Policy Choice: A Plea for Integrated Subjectivism. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
AMCIsaac_MST2013.pdf Download (336kB) |
Abstract
A question at the intersection of scientific modeling and public choice is how to deal with uncertainty about model predictions. This "high-level" uncertainty is necessarily value-laden, and thus must be treated as irreducibly subjective. Nevertheless, formal methods of uncertainty analysis should still be employed for the purpose of clarifying policy debates. I argue that such debates are best informed by models which integrate objective features (which model the world) with subjective ones (modeling the policy-maker). This integrated subjectivism is illustrated with a case study from the literature on monetary policy. The paper concludes with some morals for the use of models in determining climate policy.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Additional Information: | Paper for talk originally titled "Uncertainty about Uncertainties: A Plea for Integrated Subjectivism" | ||||||
Keywords: | models, decision theory, subjectivism, climate science, economics, policy | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Models and Idealization General Issues > Science and Policy |
||||||
Depositing User: | Alistair Isaac | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2013 09:59 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2013 09:59 | ||||||
Item ID: | 9879 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Models and Idealization General Issues > Science and Policy |
||||||
Date: | 12 July 2013 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9879 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |